星期日, 15 3 月, 2026
公民社会组织参与观察
No Result
View All Result
  • 主页
  • 关于我们
    • 源起
    • 目标
    • 愿景
    • 监测方法
    • 成员
  • 联合国人权机制
    • 人权理事会
    • 普遍定期审议
    • 联合国条约机构
    • 人权理事会特别程序
  • 会期时间表
  • 非政府组织数据
  • 监测简报
公民社会组织参与观察
  • 主页
  • 关于我们
    • 源起
    • 目标
    • 愿景
    • 监测方法
    • 成员
  • 联合国人权机制
    • 人权理事会
    • 普遍定期审议
    • 联合国条约机构
    • 人权理事会特别程序
  • 会期时间表
  • 非政府组织数据
  • 监测简报
No Result
View All Result
公民社会组织参与观察
No Result
View All Result
Home 普遍定期审议

China 4th UPR: 核可审议结果报告实录(23)赫尔辛基人权基金会发言内容

editor by editor
25 7 月, 2024
in 公民社会组织倡导
0

发言人:Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, Ms. Mélanie Blondelle

发言内容:

Mr. President,

Over the last two years, multiple UN human rights bodies raised alarm at the escalation of human rights violations in Tibet. This includes nearly one million Tibetan children separated from their families and forced into Mandarin dominated schools; extensive forced labor transfer programs; massive dislocation of the rural Tibetan population; and imprisonment of Tibetan environmental and human rights defenders. Tibetans are routinely tortured, die in custody, and are disappeared.

An unprecedented number of states offered recommendations and submitted advance questions on Tibet, demonstrating the international community’s dismay. We welcome this expression of genuine concern, which does not only acknowledge the situation on the ground, but also protects the credibility of the Human Rights Council itself.

China’s predicted rejection of almost 70% of the 23 Tibet-specific recommendations and its listing of the remainder as ‘accepted and already implemented’, contradicts verified facts.

Several states and the EU called on China to provide independent and unfettered access to Tibet, including by UN OHCHR and Special Rapporteurs. China consistently blocks such access, opting instead to spread disinformation alleging social progress as justification for its oppressive tactics. The international community must see through this thinly veiled strategy and insist on the universality and indivisibility of human rights.

We also stress that Tibetans in Tibet are not able to engage freely with UN mechanisms, foremost the UPR due to the pervasive climate of fear instilled by decades long oppression.

Despite this dire situation, options exist to achieve peaceful change. The Dalai Lama continues to pursue a path to invite dialogue and mutual understanding. The Chinese government should seize this opportunity, and the international community should press China, a Permanent Member of the UN Security Council, to fully respect the rights of the Tibetan people and to address the root causes for the conflict on the plateau.

Tibet is a test of the UN Human Rights Council’s ability to uphold universal human rights, through the UPR and beyond. It is a test it must not fail.

Thank you.

消息来源:

  1. UN WEB TV, 26th Meeting – 56th Regular Session of Human Rights Council, https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1t/k1tt6njldu
  2. ICT,As UPR concludes, UN Human Rights Council voices clear criticism of China’s abuses in Tibet, https://savetibet.org/as-upr-concludes-un-human-rights-council-voices-clear-criticism-of-chinas-abuses-in-tibet/
Previous Post

China 4th UPR: 核可审议结果报告实录(22 ):北京环球英才交流促进会发言内容

Next Post

China 4th UPR: 核可审议结果报告实录(24)中关村绿色矿山产业联盟发言内容

editor

editor

Next Post

China 4th UPR: 核可审议结果报告实录(24)中关村绿色矿山产业联盟发言内容

公民社会组织参与观察

本项目主要为人权受害者、活动者、政策倡导者、研究者、媒体、非政府组织等利益攸关方迅速获取联合国人权体系内有关中国人权情况提供资讯服务。作为一个非营利性质的平台,我们感谢网站服务器供应商和网络安全团队在我们遭到黑客攻击后提供的技术支持。

Follow Us

项目观察数据

  • 会期时间表
  • 监测简报
  • 非政府组织数据

本站热点推荐

  • HRC61:中国常驻联合国日内瓦代表团在3月13日议题4与阿拉伯叙利亚共和国问题独立国际调查委员会互动对话中发言内容
  • HRC61:中国常驻联合国日内瓦代表团在3月13日议题4与委内瑞拉玻利瓦尔共和国国际独立实况调查团互动对话中发言内容
  • HRC61:人权倡导者与转型正义工作组在3月13日议题4与朝鲜民主主义人民共和国人权状况特别报告员互动对话中发言内容

邮件订阅通讯

订阅我们发布的最新信息

Copyrights © 2023. All Rights Reserved CSOs Engagement Watch 公民社会组织参与观察

No Result
View All Result
  • 主页
  • 关于我们
    • 源起
    • 目标
    • 愿景
    • 监测方法
    • 成员
  • 联合国人权机制
    • 人权理事会
    • 普遍定期审议
    • 联合国条约机构
    • 人权理事会特别程序
  • 会期时间表
  • 非政府组织数据
  • 监测简报

Copyrights © 2023. All Rights Reserved CSOs Engagement Watch 公民社会组织参与观察